# Vellum Intelligence — Structured intelligence on regulatory change

> Regulatory movement, turned into usable judgement. Structured intelligence briefs across 174 regulatory ecosystems in 22 jurisdictions — human-led editorial, AI-scaled coverage. From £2,500/month.

Canonical: https://vellumintel.com/

---

Vellum Intelligence

# Regulatory movement, turned into usable judgement.

Choose one or multiple regulatory ecosystems and receive structured intelligence shaped to your exposure. **From £2,500 per month for single-ecosystem coverage.**

[Discuss coverage](/contact/)
[Request a sample brief](/sample-brief/)

Live registryContinuously tracked

EU AI Act
Online Safety
MiCA
age assurance

**174** ecosystems·**22** jurisdictions·[Explore the full map →](/coverage/)

Human-ledEvery brief reviewed and signed off by a named editor before delivery.

AI-scaled174 ecosystems across 22 jurisdictions — a production workflow only AI makes possible.

Lower costA fraction of the cost of equivalent in-house research or traditional advisory capacity.

24-hour deliveryBriefs aligned to the ecosystems and cadence selected at onboarding.

Why this matters

## Regulatory change isn’t the hard part to find.

The hard part is knowing what matters, what is credible, and what requires attention — faster than alerts can tell you and more consistently than internal teams can produce. Vellum is built around the gap between regulatory volume and decision-ready judgement.

### Regulatory overload

Alerts and newsletters create noise. Internal teams rarely have time to triage and analyse against their specific exposure.

### Cost of internal capacity

Standing up a regulatory research function — or retaining senior advisory firms — is expensive and slow to scale across jurisdictions.

### Cross-jurisdictional gap

The most consequential regulatory questions sit between regimes. Most providers cover one jurisdiction; Vellum draws the connections for you.

What you receive

## A structured intelligence brief.

Every Vellum brief is anchored to a defined coverage window and built around the same architecture: what changed in the period, what it means operationally, what remains uncertain, and what to watch on a 30/60/90-day horizon. Each development carries a status, a confidence rating, a date, a named actor, and an assessment of the likely landing zone.

The same standard applies whether a brief covers DSA enforcement, GCC financial regulation, or several separately maintained ecosystems selected for a client. Source ratings, evidentiary treatment, and explicit treatment of uncertainty are non-negotiable.

[See the full sample brief →](/sample-brief/)

DSA Enforcement · Sample
15–27 March 2026

#### 1. Commission opened formal proceedings against Snap Inc.

StatusFormal proceedings — five-area investigation

ConfidenceHigh

Date26 March 2026

ActorEuropean Commission

The Commission opened formal proceedings against Snap Inc. under DSA Articles 34–35 (systemic risk) to investigate whether Snapchat is ensuring a high level of safety, privacy, and security for children. The investigation covers five areas including age assurance, grooming risk, and access to illegal goods.

Likely landing zone

The five-area scope and the absorption of the Dutch DSC investigation signal that the Commission assessed sufficient evidence to proceed to formal proceedings rather than issue a preliminary RFI — pointing to interim measures or preliminary findings within 6–12 months absent proactive remediation.

Excerpt · full brief is 10 pages

What clients say

## From those who have used Vellum.

> “Insightful, clearly structured, and demonstrated the added value that Vellum Intelligence can bring.”

European regulator

> “The brief covered exactly the cross-jurisdictional issues we needed. The depth of analysis and discipline exceeded our expectations.”

UK consulting firm

Coverage

## The regulatory environment we monitor.

174 separate regulatory ecosystems across 22 jurisdictions, organised by thematic area.

Where geopolitics shapes regulation — investment screening, foreign subsidy rules, platform restrictions, cross-border data controls — we track those instruments as regulation, not as commentary.

**22** jurisdictions
·
**174** ecosystems tracked
·
[Explore the full map →](/coverage/)

How we work

## A more disciplined way to track change.

We scope coverage to the question, gather and structure evidence within the period, distinguish fact from inference from uncertainty, and deliver a single structured output. Recurring clients receive cumulative coverage: each brief shows what is genuinely new, what remains stable, and where attention should focus next.

[See methodology in full →](/how-it-works/)

## Built for decisions, not for reading.

Choose one or multiple ecosystems relevant to your exposure. The editorial standard and human sign-off remain consistent.

[Discuss coverage](/contact/)
[Scope a brief](/contact/)
[See the catalogue](/product/)